We start outside the paperwork
Documented assets are useful. Exposed assets are what attackers use.
We look at what is live, reachable and responding, including systems that may have been forgotten, misconfigured or left outside normal governance.
See your environment the way an attacker sees it.
Attackers don't begin with your asset register. They begin with whatever answers back.
A login portal left online. A test API. A contractor account. A permissive service account. A forgotten subdomain tied to production.
Mollis tests from that position.
We map what can be found, what can be reached and what can be abused. Then we follow the route until the risk is understood, the control holds or the path to impact is proven.
You'll understand how an attacker could move through your applications, cloud environments, identities and controls and which weaknesses matter most.
How we test
Documented assets are useful. Exposed assets are what attackers use.
We look at what is live, reachable and responding, including systems that may have been forgotten, misconfigured or left outside normal governance.
An issue is judged by what it enables.
Can it expose data? Can it create access? Can it increase privilege? Can it move into another system? Can it reach production?
That is how we separate noise from risk.
Findings matter most when they connect.
Where appropriate and agreed, we test whether individual weaknesses can be combined into a credible route to sensitive systems, data or privileged functions.
What we cover
We identify what is visible to the internet, including exposed services, forgotten subdomains, staging environments, login portals, cloud assets and legacy systems.
So you know what's exposed before someone else does.
We manually test authentication, access control, business logic, session handling, data exposure and API trust boundaries.
This is where real application risk often lives: in the assumptions between users, roles, functions and data.
We review accounts, roles, service principals, secrets, conditional access, logging and routes between environments.
The question is simple: if this identity is compromised, what can it reach?
We work to an agreed objective and test whether weaknesses can be combined into a route to access, privilege, data or operational impact.
This shows whether your controls work together when an attacker applies pressure across multiple systems.
We search available telemetry for suspicious access, identity misuse, persistence, unusual behaviour and gaps in visibility.
It helps distinguish between a theoretical risk and activity that may already be taking place.
We review sensitive code paths including access decisions, input handling, data flows, cryptography, dependencies and secrets.
It identifies weaknesses that can't always be seen through external testing alone.
We retest fixes and confirm the exposure has been removed.
A ticket can be marked complete while the path remains open. We verify the route has been closed.
What you'll know
Technical teams receive the evidence they need to act. Decision-makers receive the context they need to prioritise investment and reduce risk.
When to use Cyber Assurance
Cyber Assurance helps you reduce uncertainty before launching new technology, connecting suppliers or making decisions that depend on security controls performing as expected.
If you need to understand how an attacker could reach your systems and what to fix before they do, speak to Mollis.